Daily Archives: 9 July 2018

Seminar: Indira Chowdhury, Unheard Voices and Forms of Cultural Memory: Oral History and the Postcolonial Archives in India

The National Oral History Association of New Zealand and Ngā Pātaka Kōrero o Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland Libraries invite you to a presentation and discussion with visiting oral historian Indira Chowdhury.

Abstract:

This presentation draws on my attempts over the last decade and a half to create archives of different institutions and organisations in the context of oral history work undertaken in India. This presentation argues that the conceptual consequences of colonialism which defined Indians as being steeped in backward traditions and lacking in history need to be kept in mind when trying to assemble an archive of a formerly colonised people.

Brief Bio:

I argue that the insights gained from interacting with “unheard voices” also enable us to understand elite oral histories from Indian institutions. In what ways do new forms of historical representation incorporate older forms of cultural memory and oral traditions? This presentation will attempt to show how we might re-understand the idea of collecting an oral history archive and the critical ways in which we might interpret its contents within a postcolonial context.

Wednesday 25July, 2018

9:30-12:30pm

Level 3 Waitemata Room, Auckland Central City Library

Please register your attendance: treasurernohanz@oralhistory.org.nz

CFP extended: Monarchy and Modernity since 1500, University of Cambridge

The conference announced on the call for papers below was originally designed for Europeanists, but was opened up to all world areas following multiple requests by non-Europeanists to participate. The CFP has therefore been revised and the deadline extended to 15 August, 2018. Applications from anthropologists, legal scholars and political scientists are especially welcome. Please note that all proposals previously submitted remain valid.

Monarchy and Modernity since 1500, University of Cambridge, 8-9 January 2019.

Europe’s past is overwhelmingly monarchical, yet the monarchies that remain in place today hardly resemble those that governed Europe at the end of the Middle Ages. Modernity has transformed monarchy from a matter of unquestioned and often sacred fact to a matter of largely secular and usually democratic choice. If the words remain the same – along with many of the families, their titles, properties and places of residence – their meaning has changed profoundly over time and across countries, so much so that, along the centuries, the working mechanisms, functions and powers of European monarchy have been transformed. The academic literature, however, seldom measures this distance between monarchy’s various historical meanings and its surprisingly frequent manifestations today.

In theoretical and speculative disciplines, the lack of inquiry into monarchy’s significance is due partly to disciplinary divisions. Political theorists, intellectual historians, experts in jurisprudence and art and literary critics rarely delve into the subject of monarchy, while historians of monarchy tend to focus on chronology rather than concepts. Monarchy’s own nature has helped determine these divisions.With its providentialist, semi-magic and mysterious foundations in the divine right of kings, monarchism is a double paradox, a form of political theory that is at once anti-political and anti-theoretical. Innovatively, this conference seeks to break disciplinary barriers by combining the outlooks of monarchical specialists on the one hand, and of social, cultural, literary and political theorists on theother.

Proceeding from the premise that the nature of things is best known, and their development mostdetermined, during critical times, this conference centers on three (long) key moments in the history ofmodern European monarchy: the English Revolution, the French Revolution, and the mainstreamingof republicanism during the first half of the twentieth century. These moments, however, are onlyreferential, and presentations studying the reinvention, representation and conceptualisation ofmonarchy during other modern periods, from 1500 to the present, are also welcome, with Renaissancesubjects possibly serving as introits and contemporary ones as epilogues to the conference.

The main lines of inquiry are twofold, one directed at monarchy’s political-legal significance, and theother at its socio-cultural, psychological, religious, literary and spiritual roles. The political-legal lineof inquiry can include – without being limited to – European monarchy’s historical relationship tolegislation and the administration of justice, as well as democratic, republican, and aristocratictraditions. The theological/sociological/anthropological perspective is instead concerned withmonarchy as a series of rituals, processions, celebrations and formal procedures that representsovereignty, organise time and relationships, lend nations a sense of identity, and connect individualsemotionally with sacred spaces and powers.

Studies of non-European monarchical traditions are likewise accepted, preferably with reference to European ones.

Contributions may address one or more of the following themes but are not limited to them:

  1. Monarchy in political thought
  2. Monarchy and constitutionalism
  3. Monarchy in its relation with religion, theology and spirituality
  4. The relationship between spiritual and temporal powers
  5. Royalism vs. monarchism
  6. National and sovereign representation
  7. The royal imaginary, including literary representations of monarchy
  8. Monarchy and property
  9. Monarchy and material culture: art, fashion and the built environment
  10. Royal feasts, rituals, processions and celebrations
  11. Women and monarchy
  12. Non-European monarchical traditions, preferably with reference to European ones.

We invite proposals for 20-minute presentations, which will be revised subsequently for publication ina peer-reviewed collective volume. Graduate students are welcome to participate, and papers in Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish are accepted, although English isencouraged to facilitate communication. The conference will be held at the University of Cambridge on 8-9 January 2019.

Please email a 200-word abstract and one-page CV to Carolina Armenteros(cra22@cam.ac.uk) by 15 August 2018.

 

CFP: Six SMFS panels at ICMS Kalamazoo, 2019

The Society for Medieval Feminist Scholarship (SMFS) is (co-)sponsoring six panels at the 2019 International Congress on  Medieval Studies, Kalamazoo, Michigan. Details of individual panels and organisers follow.

1. Complicit: White Women and the Project of Empire

Women in medieval texts are often read as oppressed, powerless, and without agency. This panel asks how our readings of women, such as Constance in Chaucer’s Man of Law’s Tale or the Princess of Tars from The King of Tars, change when we view these women as not simply acted upon, but as complicit in the scenes of conversion and imperial power that dominate these narratives. This panel seeks papers that move beyond reading women in narratives of imperial dominance as solely victims of patriarchal structures of power, and asks what it means to recognize complicity with the project of empire alongside patriarchal oppression. The goal of this panel is to offer intersectional analyses of the project of patriarchy alongside the project of empire through a reexamination of how we define and understand women’s agency.

Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to Shyama Rajendran (shyama.rajendran@gmail.com).

2. Dysphoric Pedagogies: Teaching About Transgender and Intersex in the Middle Ages (co-sponsored by The Teaching Association for Medieval Studies (TEAMS))

Students have long seemed curious about the non-binary and non-cisgender lives that appear in courses on pre-modern periods. This panel will offer a range of pedagogy techniques, lesson plans, assignments, reading lists, and anecdotes for those interested in enhancing how they teach about transgender and intersex in the Middle Ages. The concept of “Dysphoric Pedagogies” is drawn from the DSM-5 diagnostic language that describes the experience where one’s identified or expressed gender conflicts with the gender assigned by society. Scholars will share their experiences teaching dysphoria within the art, history, and literature in an era before the DSM-5 and its various diagnoses, or the coinage of the words “transgender” or “intersex.”  How have these moments of gender diversity and conflict provoked conversations about self and society, expression and audience, nature and nurture, gender norms and non-conformity, past and present?

Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to Gabrielle M.W. Bychowski (Gabrielle.Bychowski@case.edu)

3. Critical Approaches to Medieval Men and Masculinities

In recent decades, there has been increasing engagement in medieval studies with questions of gender, space and identity as they relate to medieval men and masculinities. From the hypermasculine heroes of romance to Abelard’s eunuch body, performative medieval masculinities both uphold and challenge the structural frameworks that define medieval culture and society. As such, an understanding of medieval masculinities and their role in shaping culture and society is vital to a full reading of masculinities in the twenty-first century. This panel invites papers which contribute to and extend scholarship on medieval men and masculinities, particularly those which explore queer and intersectional masculinities.

Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to Amy Burge (dramyburge@gmail.com).

4. Girls to Women, Boys to Men: Gender in Medieval Education and Socialization

Regardless of access to formal education, children learned how to become adults in medieval society from a variety of sources. Ruth Mazo Karras’s From Boys to Men: Formations of Masculinity in Late Medieval Europe traces some of the influences and ideologies surrounding the ways medieval boys were socialized to become men, contributing to critical masculinity studies by examining the formation in addition to the manifestation of masculinity. The manifestation of medieval concepts of femininity has been extensively studied, but more attention needs to be paid to the ways in which girls were socialized to become women. This panel will expand discussions about children and childhood, gender, and education. Questions that might be raised include: How were girls trained to become women? How were girls taught to view themselves? How were they taught to view men? How were men taught to view women? What ideologies and structures played a role in the ways girls were trained or taught? How do texts reinforce or defy the dominant models of feminine training and socialization?

Organizer: Dainy Bernstein. Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to dainybernstein@gmail.com.

5. #MEditerraneanTOO (co-sponsored by the Association of Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies)

Neither rape culture nor women’s collective activism against sexual harassment and gender-based violence are 21st century phenomena, nor are they exclusive to the US. As a collaboration between the Association of Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies and the Society of Medieval Feminist Scholarship, this panel seeks papers that examine these topics transregionally, specifically around the multi-religious environment of the medieval Mediterranean. A range of methodologies is welcome – literary assessments of the querelle des femmes, court cases on the definition of rape, archival work on sex workers and violence, laws on forced concubinage between religious traditions, analysis of hagiographic tropes of forced marriage, etc.

Organizer: Jessica Boon. Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to jboon@email.unc.edu.

6. Nasty Women: Villains, Witches, Rebels in the Middle Ages (co-sponsored by the Society for the Study of Homosexuality in the Middle Ages (SSHMA))

Recent debates in modern discourse have centered around appropriate boundaries of feminine behavior. “Nastiness” has become a by-word for a specific type of womanhood, one that pushes the boundaries of acceptable sexual agency, political power, and social hierarchies. This panel will explore the various ways in “nastiness” existed in the Middle Ages, with a particular focus on gender and sexuality. How did contemporary authors, philosophers, or courts depict or deal with subversive women? How did women conceive of their own power in terms of sexual acts, gender expression, and other forms of socially-rebellious behavior? The papers in this session will address these issues through several lenses, providing new insight in the critical discourses of queer and feminist medieval scholarship.

Send abstracts, Participant Information Form, and other inquiries to Graham Drake (drake@geneseo.edu).