Dr Emily Cock, Early Career Researcher, University of Adelaide

Browsing the terrific reports on the 10th Biennial Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Association for Medieval and Early Modern Studies (ANZAMEMS) already provided by postgraduate bursary recipients, it strikes me that the point of difference I might most productively contribute is as a post-postgraduate, squeezing into bursary eligibility as an unemployed (though not for much longer, hooray!) ECR. Firstly, I must give my sincere thanks that such funding is available to early career researchers. The announcement of the Philippa Maddern Memorial Prize for a publication by an ECR is also very welcome news, and typifies the supportive structure I have always found within the ANZAMEMS community toward younger scholars. I did not realise until I began attending conferences overseas how lucky we are to have the full mix of postgraduate-to-professor scholars attending the same conference. Elsewhere, I experienced bizarre weeks in which the tenured academics attended The Conference, while the postgraduates were next door at a Symposium… and no one crossed the threshold. Here, by contrast, I benefitted greatly from research, presentation and career feedback from across the board, including (a vivid memory) Dolly McKinnon encouraging me out of a huddled, defensive posture into a lesson on “how to stand” after my very first conference presentation at ANZAMEMS, 2007.

The two round tables I attended were both useful, in different ways. The first was “Career options for Graduate Students and Recent PhDs beyond the Tenure-Track Job”. This was a timely inclusion given the current state of the academic job market, and handled in an encouraging manner for the most part. The panel highlighted that a postgraduate research qualification prepares graduates for more than university teaching/research, and was refreshing for discussing such options (eg. publishing, academic support) as equally viable and worthwhile career paths, rather than—as I have often heard the case made—fall back options to only consider once you have “failed” to achieve a tenure-track position. One PhD student’s comment of hesitation at “coming out” to their supervisor about these sort of career interests typifies this culture, which is likely to shift in coming years as the number of PhDs awarded to jobs available continues to slide further apart. The second roundtable to establish the “Maddern-Crawford Network”, led by Clare Monagle and Dolly MacKinnon, also acknowledged the difficulty facing junior (here, specifically female) scholars, and here workshopped practical ways in which a network of female scholars at different stages of their careers can help each other and advance the field in general. If the job statistics in the careers session left me a bit bereft, this panel was an excellent antidote, blending a little feminist belly fire with the practicality of network support.

This was also the conference at which I finally caved in to twitter (@EmilyNCock), and very much enjoyed following the ANZAMEMS hash tag for sessions I was unable to attend.

Brid Phillips, Doctoral Candidate, English and Cultural Studies, School of Humanities, University of Western Australia

Faces, Facts, and Fellow Researchers

The wonderful round up of the 10th Biennial Conference of the Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies (ANZAMEMS) expressed by Olivia Formby aptly describes the highlights of the conference’s plenary speakers, the range and depth of papers and panels, and of course touches on the many extra curricular events that added colour, excitement and collegial discussion to a far-reaching and stimulating event.

For my part I would like to add to the conversation by discussing some of the particular highlights that made the experience especially rewarding for me. As Olivia notes there was a very strong field of representatives from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotions with many of the researchers forming coherent panels exploring significant themes such as Facial Feeling and Religious Dislocation. There were three panels around the theme of facial feeling, “Facial feeling in early modern England,” “Facial feeling – idealization, disfigurement, and interpretation,” and “Facial feeling in medieval English literature.” As I am researching emotional expression through facial colouring in Shakespeare’s dramas, I was very pleased to find myself on a panel with Peter Sherlock and Stephanie Trigg. Needless to say it was daunting to face the podium after two such respected speakers but I was put at ease by both their subject matter, which was so engaging that I was able to forget my own nerves momentarily, and also by the supportive audience. Stephanie, as organizer of the panels, also encouraged all the panel participants to support each other which resulted in a fertile dialogue opening up across the subject which, I am sure, will compliment each individual’s ongoing work in the field.

Two roundtables which stood out as particularly beneficial to the postgrad (and/or female) student were the “Career options for Graduate Students and Recent PhDs beyond the Tenure-Track Job” and the “Maddern-Crawford Network.” The former, ably chaired by our New Zealand post grad representative, Amanda McVitty, gave a positive spin to the depressing academic future that early career researchers face. All three speakers had made valuable career choices and had taken opportunities that being a PhD graduate had afforded them. The ensuing discussion was both lively and illuminating and many thanks to Stephanie Trigg who took the opportunity to tweet the salient points of information allowing the rest of us to focus and engage on the dialogue in hand. The latter round table was a presentation and discussion led by Clare Monagle and Dolly MacKinnon regarding the start up of a new network in honour of Patricia Crawford and Philippa Maddern. The network aims to provide mentoring and support for postgraduate and early-career female and female-identified scholars in medieval and early modern studies. The network is grounded in recent research regarding females in the field and was overwhelmingly supported by the many attendees of the inaugural meeting. It featured energy, commitment, and support from across the generations and certainly gained momentum from those who were present.

I want to make reference to a specific difference the bursary made to my trip. Coming from Perth the financial outlay is significant and while I had access to funds that covered my travel expenses I initially considered staying with family as a cost cutting venture (and also as a family bonding venture!). However with the ANZAMEMS travel bursary I elected to stay on campus at the University of Queensland which reaped many positive benefits. Instead of negotiating public transport for hours each day I got to walk across the beautiful Queensland winter campus; I connected with the other conference delegates who were also staying at the same college; I was able to use the time not spent travelling to work- to participate and connect; and despite the busy schedule I did get to spend an evening devoted solely to catching up with family without the pressure of trying to juggle the extensive conference programme.

Finally, I wish to make mention of the ANZAMEMS general meeting as I think this was a space that added value to the conference. It was well attended and was an opportunity to put a face to the names that we all had come to know in the lead up to the conference. President Chris Jones was inclusive and superb in negotiating time for comments from the floor while conscious of the urgency of catching the conference dinner bound ferry! It was amazing to hear so many supportive and generous ideas coming from the floor and as a new comer to the committee I am very pleased and excited to be a part of the future of ANZAMEMS.

As always, with such a diverse and full program, a minor drawback is a clash of interesting panels which on the whole was a very small price to pay for the overall experience during which a spirit of collegiality shone through!

Derek Whaley, Doctoral Candidate, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

It would be disingenuous of me to describe the 10th Biennial Conference of the Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies (ANZAMEMS) as everything I had hoped it would be. Perhaps that is the result of unrestrained enthusiasm for a medieval and early modern history conference with nothing to compare it to. Or perhaps it is caused by the striking realisation that I do not understand my period nearly as well as I had hoped. In any event, the conference was a wake-up call for me in many respects. It was my first academic history conference and it will not be my last.

One thing that shook the foundations of my understanding of history from the very beginning was the realisation that medieval and early modern history is an extremely vast subject composed of so many myriad parts. It spans the world, and the inclusion of presentations on Japanese and Arab societies really brought that home to me. Roundtable discussions in the evenings showcased the long-standing disagreements between historians over periodisation, globalisation, and female scholarship, as well as what careers are really opened to historians. In the deluge of information, I found myself often drowning in data and saddened that the topics I enjoyed so much were but a drop of water in a torrential rain.

Indeed, being a medieval Capetian historian, I found almost nothing that directly applied to my interests and little that peripherally referenced them. This left me with the onerous task of deciding which sessions I would attend throughout the five days of the conference. Sometimes I had great luck in my decisions, while other times the sessions fell flat for me. I am a particular person with particular interests, so not everything can be made easily interesting to me. I think that organising the papers by subject, while logical, actually hurt some of the sessions by bloating the topics with repetition or ghettoising specific topics that may not have attracted universal appeal. Mixing the various papers in the future may result in more people moving between sessions, but it also may result in higher turnouts for papers that would otherwise be ill attended.

While this was my first official conference, it is not the first time I have heard postgraduate and established historians speak in public. I was raised in the American school of communication and as such, I find the idea of literally reading papers, as many presenters did, to be somewhat tedious if not presented with forethought for the audience. A read paper is very different from a rehearsed presentation and those who presented their material off-script almost universally earned my attention over those those who simply read a modified chapter of their thesis. This is not to say that the content quality was different between the two, only that when presenting, those who speak to the audience come across as more confident and engaging than those who just read.

That being said, I presented my own research on the last session of the last day of the conference and was happy that so many people did attend considering the scheduling. I spoke off script, referencing my PowerPoint slides when necessary and otherwise working off an internal dialogue based on my thesis chapter and other research. It seems to have been well received, but only a few people were able to discuss the presentation since the conference ended immediately afterwards. I hope that if I attend a future conference, an earlier session may be afforded to me because the ability to discuss your topic with others, based partially off of your presentation, seems to be an essential aspect of the conference-going experience.

It is networking with others that the ANZAMEMS conference really succeeded for me. More important than the presentations, the keynotes, and the PATS was the ability to discuss ideas and research dilemmas with other post-graduate and early career historians. From the very first day, I felt welcomed by my peers, a member of the illustrious network of Australian and New Zealand historians. Throughout the course of the conference, I met many people, talked with them at lunch, and went out to dinner with them in the evening. My prized trophies from the conference are not CV-boosting presentation skills but a clutch of business cards I gathered. These are what will keep me in contact with those who will help me in the years to come. Networking is an essential part of careers, especially now, and so meeting new people and expanding your range of contacts all helps to ensure that when the time comes for a career decision, or when a referee is need, or even when you just need a person to talk to about your research, you will be prepared.

On that note, I must end by stating my general disappointment with the Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar (PATS). Touted to me as an opportunity to expand my skills in a series of intensive training sessions, and advertised by previous PATS-goers as something worth the time, I found myself severely disappointed that nothing of the sort occurred here. The PATS was composed of a kind of present-and-respond format where the keynote speakers and the students all presented their thesis topic in brief and then responded briefly to it. It was not only unhelpful to the majority of us, but rather strange in its formatting. Had this exact same PATS occurred at the beginning of the conference rather than the end, it would have at least served as a postgraduate mixer to allow us to all meet each other and meet some accomplished historians. But placed at the end of the conference, it served only as an awkward footnote to an otherwise stimulating week.

Nonetheless, the ANZAMEMS conference felt like a success and it furnished me with myriad angles to consider in my future research and in my thesis. The range of historians I met while at the conference surprised and delighted me and made me see the lasting importance of medieval and early modern history to the present. Thank you to all the crew that helped make the conference happen and I hope to see you all again in Wellington in 2017.

Rachel Allerton, MA Research candidate, Macquarie University

As my first introduction to ANZAMEMS, I found the 2015 10th Biennial Conference programme crammed full of fascinating papers on medieval and early modern topics. It was an educational and useful experience for me as a postgraduate, and I benefited enormously from meeting and hearing established academics in my field talk about their research and theories.

The round table discussions on global medievalism and post PhD employment were specifically aimed at emerging scholars and bore fruit in opening the topic to greater thought and dialogue. I believe ANZAMEMS is in a unique position to provide guidance to emerging scholars and I saw this occurring through the interaction of established academics and postgraduates.

I was also pleased at the initiative in women’s networking undertaken by Dr Dolly MacKinnon (UQ) and Dr Clare Monagle (Macquarie University) with the formation of the Maddern-Crawford Network (MCN) in fostering support and guidance for women in the the field of historical research. This is an enterprise close to my heart as a female postgraduate.

While this was my first attempt at presenting a paper I feel that I gained experienced in not only writing and presenting my research and argument, but also connecting with other scholars and working collaboratively.

I hope to attend the next ANZAMEMS in 2017 in New Zealand. I will start saving now!

Olivia Formby, History MPhil Candidate, University of Queensland

For a select group of postgraduate students, ANZAMEMS 2015 carried on with a one-day Postgraduate Advanced Training Seminar (PATS) on Monday 20^th July, chaired by Dr Denis Collins (UQ). This was an incredible opportunity to exchange ideas on a more intimate level with the conference keynote speakers Professors Alexandra Walsham (University of Cambridge), Laura Knoppers (Notre Dame University), and Jessie Ann Owens (UC Davis). Each of the keynotes spoke to a different theme which related to our areas of postgraduate research, before leading a general discussion on the historical and methodological “problems” of that theme.

Professor Alexandra Walsham began the day with an expert presentation on the theme of “religion,” an intrinsic aspect of the medieval and early modern worlds, and one that she warns must not be ignored. The danger of post-confessional, Enlightened history in a highly secularised Western world is that it can become difficult to take seriously the dynamism of religious beliefs in the past. As historians, it is important to remain aware of our own biases, in order to avoid the terrible “condescension of posterity.” But even as we acknowledge the reality of religious belief – and unbelief – in the past, how can we access it, particularly through often highly-mediated sources? As a group, Walsham led us to examine two extracts from fifteenth-century heresy trial depositions and, by “reading between the lines,” we were able to dissect some interesting ideas about genre, heresy and the fluid, complicated nature of religion in quite a short space of time!

The theme of “representations” was presented by Professor Laura Knoppers, who framed her discussion around the power and uses of literary, visual and material representations in the past. This was a complex theme, and relevant to all of our work with primary source material. Knoppers asked, “What is the problem of representation?” Certainly, as with understanding religious beliefs in the past, the “problem” often stems from our modern view-point. Socio-political context and communal/individual memory were essential to the interpretation (and therefore the power) of representations in the past, and so it is important for historians to place representations – whether in the form of a woodcut or a poem – as closely in their contemporary setting as possible, before discerning their “meaning.” Knoppers had us compare the regal portraits of Charles II and Louis XIV in order to realise the many little ways in which a single representation might establish relationships, authority and identity.

The final theme, and perhaps the most contentious, was that of “emotions,” expertly negotiated by Professor Jessie Ann Owens. A popular topic in the ANZAMEMS 2015 program, the history of emotions is a relatively new field, and still grappling with questions of definition and methodology. As historians begin to agree that emotions were expressed and experienced differently in the medieval and early modern past (as compared with the present), the central issue becomes our ability to adequately historicise our discussion of emotions, or rather “passions” or “sensibilities” or “humours,” as well as to access intangible and individualised feelings in the sources. Owens led an active discussion of methodology, with Barbara Rosenwein’s “emotional communities” as the starting point.

After these thematic presentations, we were given the privilege of presenting a brief report of our postgraduate research and to receive direct feedback from the expert keynotes on our topics, sources and methods. Their advice was invaluable. Visiting Professor Graeme Boone (Ohio State University) also called upon us to ask ourselves “What is at stake?” in our research, to vocalise our central thesis question, and to draw from it an answer which resonates with us, in order to remain relevant academically and engaged personally. PATS was definitely an experience that I will be taking with me into the rest of my research degree.

Olivia Formby, History MPhil Candidate, University of Queensland

If the 10th Biennial Conference of the Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies (ANZAMEMS) had a theme, it might have been “diversifying.” As a postgraduate delegate, I was privileged to attend papers which not only stemmed from a diverse range of disciplines, including history, philosophy, literature, art history, religion, and music, but which also transcended the traditional boundaries of those disciplines to offer new insights into our study of the past.

The first keynote address by Prof. Jessie Ann Owens of UC Davis on “Cipriano de Rore and the Musical Representation of Emotion” set the dynamic tone of the conference. A Professor of Music, this was Owens’ first foray into the history of emotions and, by her own account, has produced new ideas for her current work on de Rore. Indeed, Day One was marked by a variety of innovative and interesting papers on such topics as pregnancy, poetry, and providence. In the evening, the Welcome Reception held at the UQ Art Museum was the perfect opportunity to begin networking with the other delegates, many of whom had traversed the globe to be there, from places as close as New Zealand, and as far as Scotland. The Reception revolved around the current Wunderkammer exhibition (open until 13th September), an eclectic collection of cultural curiosities from the Medieval and Early Modern worlds, and an apt mirror of the colourful and diverse ANZAMEMS 2015 program.

Day Two was opened by Prof. Laura Knoppers, Professor of English at Notre Dame University, with her keynote address entitled “‘Draw our Luxury in Plumes’: Andrew Marvell and the Aesthetics of Disgust.” This paper was highly evocative of Restoration England and thoroughly entertaining in its reading of Marvell’s raunchier satires. After morning tea, I was honoured, and not a little nervous, to be giving my own (very first) conference paper on “The Emotional Responses of Ordinary Villagers to the Eyam Plague, 1665-1666.” This opportunity to present my research to, and alongside, a broad and highly engaged academic community was invaluable. Although I enjoyed a wide range of panels throughout the conference, I happily found my own niche on Day Two in the next panel session on Early Modern “Sickness and Health.” The day ended with a relaxed Postgraduate Drinks gathering at the Red Room, sponsored by the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry and UQ ANZAMEMS Chair. It was wonderful to meet fellow students in various stages of postgraduate life, and to share many other conference “firsts.”

The final keynote address was delivered on Day Three by Prof. Alexandra Walsham, Professor of Modern History at the University of Cambridge on “Domesticating the Reformation: Material Culture, Memory and Confessional Identity in Early Modern England.” This fascinating paper, accompanied by spectacular images, explored how items of Delftware formed domestic religious identities in Reformation England through the appropriation of print and image, and was a highlight of ANZAMEMS 2015. Possibly the most diversifying element of the conference was the presence of researchers from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the History of Emotions (ARC CHE), who formed a total of six panels, including two on Day Three. These panels centred on a single concept, such as “facial feeling” or “religious dislocation,” but incorporated multiple disciplinary approaches in their investigation of this still-burgeoning field. In the afternoon, I joined my fellow postgraduates for a round table on “Career Options” which discussed the challenges of the “traditional” tenure-track career, as well as alternative avenues for postgraduates including publishing, teaching, and librarianship. In the evening, I had the pleasure of attending the Conference Dinner at Customs House, courtesy of ARC CHE which sponsored the tickets of thirty honours and postgraduate students. This was a lovely evening, accompanied by the music of The Badinerie Players, who matched their arrangements to four of the conference papers, including Owens’.

The final two days of ANZAMEMS were filled to the brim with papers that spanned the breadth and depth of the Medieval and the Early Modern, from an emotional history of “Moravian Missions and Slavery in the Caribbean” to a study of “Women and Religious Mendicancy in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries.” Day Four culminated in the inaugural meeting of the Maddern-Crawford Network, so-named for two great women in our field, and so-formed as a collective network for female academics in what is still a male-dominated profession. This round table generated a lively sense of dialogue and community, which I am sure will burn into the future.

As ANZAMEMS 2015 came to a close on Saturday 18th July, I was able to reflect on the many exchanges that had taken place, the invigorating discussion of research and ideas, as well as the new networks I had formed with other postgraduates and academics that will surely be an amazing future resource. Twitter will be a useful tool for maintaining many of these connections and, indeed, was itself a site of diverse academic exchange during the conference for anyone following the official hashtag: #ANZAMEMS2015. This was a conference of Medieval and Early Modern studies that was diversifying – and energising – in its international, open-themed and interdisciplinary form.

Lindsay Dean Breach, Doctoral Candidate, University of Canterbury

Australian & New Zealand Association for Medieval & Early Modern Studies (ANZAMEMS) did a amazing job with the 10th Biennial Conference. It is prudent to begin with thanks to those organisers behind the scenes. As Chris Jones said in his address: When things run smoothly; it’s easy to forget to say thank you. The University of Queensland was also a terrific venue. I speak from a New Zealand perspective when I say the weather was ‘fantastic’. However, comments about the weather speak to the international element of the conference. It is a testament to the esteem of ANZAMEMS that an Australasian event can attract so many international peers from as far away as Russia. Particularly because we often consider ourselves geographically isolated.

This was my first conference. My foremost concern is that the bar has been set very high. For me personally, this will be the conference against which I will judge future events. The conference boasted many wonderful papers and it was difficult to choose which to attend. The papers I did settle on were splendid. Each conveyed the labour of love of the presenter. It is important to me personally that the audience asks respectful questions and treats the presenter with the dignity they deserve. I was warned that similar academic events (clearly not ANZAMEMS events!) are often treated as opportunities to display arrogant ‘one-up-manship.’ Or worse still, professors attempting to assert their dominance over postgraduates (apparently such poor conduct happens!) to satisfy their egos. I am very happy to report this was not the case here. I did not witness a single example of undignified posturing by any member of ANZAMEMS.The conference was a friendly and safe environment of the kind that promotes learned discourse. To sum up briefly, the atmosphere was positive and audience participation was constructive.

I had the pleasure to attend papers on various subjects on medieval and early modern history. I learned a lot. To name a few, I attended a paper describing how modern conceptions of Frederick the Great as a ‘dandy’ did not impact upon his status as a King (Dr Bodie Ashton, University of Adelaide). Dr Michael Ostling (University of Queensland) expertly covered the de-mythologising of fairies and magic in an age of rationalism. Another paper described the passage of death as a pilgrimage and how the poems of Sir Walter Raleigh present this image (Cyril Caspar, University of Zurich). One paper, as part of a History of Emotions, described the impact of disfigurement on conveying emotions and pre-modern physiological understanding of the face (Dr Emily Cock, University of Adelaide). Finally, Erica Steiner (Independent Scholar) furnished an excellent paper on a ship called the hulc, which could be described as the workhorse of the British Isles. I attended many other worthy papers that I do not have space here to mention.

My own paper concerned the use, or early trust, in medieval English law. It stands as a challenge to the ‘accepted truth’ today, attributed to Pollock and Maitland, which holds the use as having emerged in response to England’s involvement in the crusades. My own panel concerned law and politics. There were numerous others panels that covered a variety of subjects such as theology, musicology, and politics. I initially approached the conference with some trepidation because I had the perceptible misfortune of being the first paper on the first day of the conference. As this was my first conference, it was an entirely new experience and I did not know what to expect. I admit to being nervous. However, I am glad to say that any thoughts of misfortune quickly evaporated. My chair did a wonderful job and I got excellent feedback. Next time, I know I can depend on the positive and supportive disposition of the ANZAMEMS membership.

The conference provided an amazing opportunity to meet experts in their field. It provided ample opportunity to exchange ideas in general discourse or in direct response to questions. Moreover, I arranged to co-publish an article with one member who I met at the conference. Therefore, the ability to exchange ideas is fundamental to the experience. ANZAMEMS facilitated the networking aspect of the conference with ample social gatherings. These proved to furnish closer relationships with existing colleagues and create new bonds with others. I am happy to say that I made a number of positive contacts and formed a number of friendships with people who I am keeping in contact with after the conference. I had no negative interactions.

Nothing ever runs perfectly and ANZAMEMS would do well to take the lessons it learned here and apply them to the next event in Wellington. I have no negative criticisms. The only room for improvement lies in the observance of the 20 minutes allocated to the papers. It is understandable when you get so many academics together that their passions shine through their papers. This is great but can mean papers may run over time. Even 10 minutes over time! The ability of chairs to control the exuberance of the speakers greatly varied. Part of the problem regarded perceptions of seniority. While not overtly an issue, it is clear that some chairs (namely postgraduates) were reluctant to stop their superiors (e.g. their supervisors). The clear lesson is that chairs should be of equal or of higher seniority to speakers.

In conclusion, the conference was one of the most positive experiences of my life. It is something I will never forget. It proved to be a superb academic experience and a wonderful opportunity to connect with others. Unfortunately for ANZAMEMS, the bar is now very high. Future organisers are faced with the expectations of a similar event. With that said: I look forward to see if the next ANZAMEMS conference in Wellington in 2017 can meet the standard now set.

As part of the ANZAMEMS Postgraduate/ECR Travel Bursary Funding for 2015, bursary recipients are required to submit a brief report about the recent 10th ANZAMEMS Conference and PATS at The University of Queensland in July 2015. Over the next few months these reports will be posted to the newsletter as part of the ANZAMEMS member news section. First up are Julie Anne Davis (University of Melbourne) and Julie Robarts (University of Melbourne). Thanks to you both.

Julie Anne Davis, Doctoral Candidate, School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, University of Melbourne

The biennial ANZAMEMS Conference is, to me, one of the most significant conference events in our field. I believe that having the opportunity to talk with a variety of specialists from around the world is very important for emerging scholars, as is meeting other postgraduate students from other universities. Every two years ANZAMEMS provides the opportunity for friendships to be forged and renewed and a forum in which new research can be both tested and absorbed. I was particularly pleased this year to meet several of the Queensland based scholars who I have, as yet, not been fortunate enough to encounter in person though I have been engaging with their work for several years.

I also appreciate the collegial environment fostered by ANZAMEMS that promotes, for by far the most part, constructive and supportive feedback that encourages both speakers and listeners to continue to develop and improve their work. Observing the discussion about other people’s work, even when not directly related to my own, is something that I find is always valuable, encouraging me to find new angles from which to explore and assess my own work. I feel that I learnt a lot over the course of this conference not only from the discussion of my own work, but also from the exposure to a variety of other fields, methodologies and approaches.

Given the importance of this event I do have some concerns that it is becoming more difficult for postgraduate students to attend. The student rate for ANZAMEMS is now significantly more for postgraduate registration than other similar conferences including AHA and ANZASA. I would like to thank the Committee for offering the bursaries which I am sure helped make all the difference for many of the recipients. I would, however, also like to ask the Committee to please consider revisiting the subsidisation of the postgraduate rate to ensure that the student discount is making a genuine difference and not being cancelled out by rate exclusions so that as many emerging scholars as possible can continue to benefit from this wonderful event.

Julie Robarts, Doctoral Candidate, Italian Studies, School of Languages and Linguistics, University of Melbourne

Thanks to the bursary granted by the ANZAMEMS committee I was delighted to be able to attend the Tenth Biennial International Conference at the University of Queensland between 14-18 July, 2015, and the PATS on the Monday following. It was a great pleasure to meet scholars and postgraduate ANZAMEMS members that I have not seen since Tasmania 2008, while working on my MA. Presenting a portion of my PhD research on the first day of the conference was a new and welcome experience, and meant I was free to engage fully in the intellectual stimulation of sessions and keynotes, and opportunities for socialising offered by the meal breaks. The excellent time-keeping of those chairing panels made it easy to make the conference one’s own, for those who choose to panel hop. I am grateful too, for receiving a ticket to the magnificent conference dinner, in the magnificent Customs House. At the PATS on Monday the 20th, post-graduates benefited from the generosity of our three conference keynote speakers, Prof. Alexandra Walsham (University of Cambridge), Prof. Laura Knoppers (University of Notre Dame), Prof. Jesse Anne Owens (University of California, Davis), and CHE UQ visitor Prof. Graeme Boone (Ohio State University) as they engaged with each of the eighteen attendees about our research, and shared their insights on methodologies to inform and challenge our work. Dr Dolly MacKinnon and the UQ organising committee were an inspiration throughout the week, modelling the energy, warmth and hospitality that inform the emotional bonds of the ANZAMEMS community.

Dear members, please find below some reflections on the recent ANZAMEMS conference at the University of Queensland in July 2015, by, Professor Sybil Jack. Thank you for taking the time to give us this short report on the conference.

Thoughts on the 10^th ANZAMEMS conference

When you have helped plant something it is impossible not to check from time to time on how it is growing. This large and diverse conference run by a professional conference organisation which by defining me, and some contemporaries, as students or unwaged suitably prevented hubris while suggesting that research is never complete – and that academic life is poorly remunerated— is remarkably different from the various early conferences that were unprofessionally managed by us. Like all conferences its most useful real purpose is to bring together those who, despite the merits of email, can rarely profitably talk at length about their work and shared interests. One can only hope that this is not turning into the job-seeking competition of so many American conferences. The committee’s desire to promote job finding for postgraduates as an alternate reality is admirable in principle but Sisyphus may have had a better chance of true success.

The papers, of course, were the main focus and amongst the many, when one could attend only a few, my interests drew me to those on subjects not currently fashionable especially music and liturgy, law and economy. No-one could resist Jessie Ann Owens introduction on Cypriano de Rore but later papers had enthusiastic but small audiences. Francis Yapp on the Paris Concert Spirituel was outstanding, as was Paul McMahon on how Handel used rhetorical devices to move the affections of his listeners. Claire Renkin cast new light on the tradition of the relationship of Mary and the Magdalen. Marika Räsänen explained how the liturgy might be adapted to create the presence of a physically absent saint, while Leah Morrison enlightened us on Carthusian liturgical practice. Eric Palazzo used liturgical manuscripts to reveal what Dominic’s nine ways of prayer meant to devotional practice. And, if death is the end Cyril Caspar explored how it was tied to ideas of pilgrimage. Carole Carson explained why types of wall paintings were found on particular sides of East Anglian churches in which Irena Larking’s communities were reconstructing their communities in post reformation England. Marcus Harmes showed that bishops without positions could still influence the church raising interesting questions about church/state relations. Lindsay Breach re-examined how the legal ‘use’ came into law in England, and Peter Cunich offered a new idea about monastic economy on the eve of the Dissolution.

These and other papers made the time stimulating and informative the dinner and all the other moments of entertainment only added to the enjoyment.

Professor Sybil Jack’s research focus is on Europe during the 16th and 17th century. She taught in the history department at the University of Sydney. She obtained her degrees from Oxford University, and later completed her Diploma in Education at the University of New England. Sybil Jack began teaching at Sydney University in 1963 as a senior tutor in Economic History, in the faculty of Economics. In 1971 she joined the Arts faculty, upon being appointed lecturer in the History department. She was promoted to senior lecturer in 1975, and to associate professor in 1985. She was Dean of the Faculty of Arts from 1986-1989. A year after retiring in 1997, she became an honorary research associate. She is a long-standing ANZAMEMS member.